As all expectant parents (and even couples who aren’t expecting) do, Dave and I have begun to discuss baby names. At the moment, due to it’s being thoroughly appropriate, we call the baby “Chuck”. Although I must admit during my worst moments it’s also been referred to as “The Little Bastard” (not exactly accurate), “The Parasite” (very accurate), and I must shamefacedly, and repentently admit, ”Spawn of Satan” (I was feeling very particularly unwell and catching sight of the stretch marks careering across my thighs and buttocks didn’t cheer me up any).
Anyway, being the thoroughly organised person that I am, I’d like to have a name picked out. Whilst I would like my children to have slightly original names, I’d prefer to do this by picking old-fashioned, not very commonly used names, rather than the current fashion of making it up myself (I might think I’m creative, the rest of the World will probably just think I’m stupid, and what if I just called my child a very rude word in another language) or taking a regular name, and spelling it differently. Don’t even get me started on that. It’s not cute, it’s not clever, and your poor child will be spelling his name to everyone for the rest of his life! Nor will I name our child after it’s place of conception. Somehow Eight Mile Plains doesn’t sound quite right.
I’m not a hippy, and I have no aspirations to rival Hollywood celebrities in their competition for who can give their child the most ridiculous name, but there is a name that has always sounded nice to me. I’ve always loved the girl’s name “Cherry”. Of course, I would never, ever call my daughter Cherry. I know only too well how the vile, crude and immature minds of teenage boys work, and no, I will never inflict the kind of comments such a name will draw on my innocent daughter. Though I haven’t decided if it’s any worse than another unfortunate name I once had the amusement of spotting. Looking through a childhood friend’s class photo, I happened upon the name of a girl christened “Pinky Brown” by her obviously cruel and unusual parents. I sincerely hope high school wasn’t too traumatic for her, and she’s married to a lovely man with any last name but Brown.
Anyway, while I prefer the older names, there are some that I wouldn’t go near with a 10 foot pole. For example: Bertha, Beryl, Cecil, Agnes, Eugene… you get the picture. Another problem I’m finding comes up more and more is the incompatibility of our last name with the most respectable of first names. Some of my favourite names have been shifted to the “discard” pile after sounding them out with our last name of “Muller”.
Muller, I know, is a completely normal, and rather boring last name. But I got quite a surprise at the number of names that sound odd, wrong, or just plain comical when placed before it. This is partly because despite the correct pronunciation being “muller“, we live in Australia. And as long as we are Australian, us Aussie ockers will always pronounce it “mullah”, thus rendering any name that ends with an “ah” sound ridiculous. So automatically the name Ella is out – this I don’t mind at all. There is a startling popularity of Ella’s as the moment, as well as Isobella’s (shortened to Bella), and I can just imaging roll-call at school in 5 or so years time: ”Ella Marshall”, “here”, “Ella Jones”, “here”, “Ella Smith”, “here”, Ella Watkins… But there’s other names I now cannot ever call my children. Not only do names ending with an “ah” sound odd, but also names with a double “L” in them, and names beginning with “M” too. Some examples: Hannah, Milly, Deanna, Melissa, Milton, Marshall… And so it goes on.
So, what am I to do? I’ve begun compiling a list of definite “no-goes” as well as a list of “approved” names, and this will hopefully help to narrow down some choices. Or, we could just throw all common sense out the window do what Dave suggested. One night as I was half-heartedly going through my lists, Dave peered over my shoulder and exclaimed, “If it’s a girl, let’s call her “Daniella Molly Hannah Muller!”